Reproduction of the Control Group in REMDACTA Trial Using the Millennial Medical Record, an Electric Health Record Database, in Japan

Objectives: Developing a control group of a clinical trial using real world data is desirable and ethically sound despite challenges pertaining to internal validity. To examine the internal validity, we reproduced the control group in a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) using Electric Health Record (EHR) data and evaluated the difference between the outcome of the original trial and that of the reproduced analysis. Method(s): We selected an RCT, REMDACTA trial, that was performed to evaluate the efficacy of tocilizumab plus remdesivir against placebo plus remdesivir in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. We reproduced its control group (patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia taking only remdesivir), using Japanese EHR data, Millennial Medical Record provided by Life Data Initiative. Target patients for the main analysis were those prescribed remdesivir within 2 days after admission and diagnosed with COVID-19 (defined by ICD-10 code, U07.1) and/or with COVID-19 pneumonia (defined by diagnosis name). Patients in the sub analysis included only those with COVID-19 pneumonia diagnosis. Among the target patients, those undergoing image inspection, oxygen administration, and not taking any medicines for pneumonia before the first remdesivir prescription were eligible for the analyses. Median length of stay was compared in the reproduced group and in REMDACTA trial. Result(s): The database included 676 and 110 target patients for the main and sub analyses, respectively. However, only 57 and 14 patients met the eligibility criteria for the main and sub analyses, respectively. The reduction in the number of patients is attributed to the criteria of image inspection and oxygen administration. Median length of stay in the reproduced group were 13 and 11 days in the main and sub analyses, respectively. In REMDACTA trial, 95% CI of median time was 11.0-16.0. Conclusion(s): We successfully reproduced the median time of the control group by EHR data.Copyright © 2023

Outcome of COVID-19 on Indian patients with cancer: A multicenter, retrospective study

Background: Managing patients with cancer during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been challenging. Disruptions in cancer management have been observed due to cancellation of treatment, issues related to commuting, and dearth of health-care workers. Objective(s): This study was conducted during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and was aimed at evaluating the 30-day all-cause mortality among patients with cancer and COVID-19 infection and the factors affecting it. Material(s) and Method(s): In this retrospective study, we collected secondary data from nine tertiary care centers in South India over a period of 10 months from March to Dec 2020. Patients across all age groups with histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of cancer who were affected by COVID-19 during their evaluation or treatment were included in the study. The primary outcome variables of the present study were 30-day all-cause mortality, cancer outcomes, and COVID-19 outcomes. Result(s): A total of 206 patients were included. Median age of the cohort was 55.5 years, and the male-To-female ratio was 1:1.03. The 30-day mortality rate was 12.6%. Twenty-Two patients (10.7%) had severe COVID-19 infection at the initial presentation. Predictors for severe pneumonia at the initial presentation were incomplete remission at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis and palliative intent of treatment. Severe pneumonia at the initial presentation, diagnosis of COVID-19 on or before August 2020, and need for ventilator support were associated with increased mortality. Conclusion(s): Severity of infection at the initial presentation, cancer status, and the intent of cancer treatment impact COVID-19 outcomes in patients with cancer.Copyright © 2022 Iranian Society of Ophthalmology. All rights reserved.

A serum interleukin-6-based analysis of patients with nasopharyngeal swab reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction negative for SARS-CoV-2 infection with CO-RADS 4 and 5 on computed tomography of the chest

Background: Serum interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels have been studied in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) disease (COVID-19). Methods: We studied the utility of treatment with tocilizumab in COVID-19 patients (n=19) with a negative nasopharyngeal swab real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2 who had suggestive computed tomography (CT) findings, namely, COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) 4,5. Results: Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that serum IL 6 at a cut-off of >56.9 pg/L was a predictor of mortality in nasopharyngeal swab RT-PCR negative patients with suggestive CT findings. Tocilizumab had no significant effect on the mortality. Conclusions: In nasopharyngeal swab RT-PCR negative patients with suggestive chest CT findings, elevated serum IL-6 levels > 56.9 pg/L predicted mortality. However, treatment with tocilizumab had no effect on mortality.

The effectiveness of Tocilizumab in severe covid 19 pneumonia among critically ill patients

Background: Tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 (IL-6) antagonist, is being evaluated for the management of covid-19 pneumonia. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of Tocilizumab in severe covid-19 pneumonia. Method(s): This was a retrospective, observational, single centre study performed in 121 patients diagnosed with severe covid-19 pneumonia. 83 patients received standard of care treatment whereas 38 patients received tocilizumab along with standard of care. Tocilizumab was administered intravenously at 8mg/kg (upto a maximum of 800mg). The second dose of Tocilizumab was given 12 to 24 hours apart. The primary outcome measure was ICU related and hospital related mortality. The secondary outcome measures were change in clinical status of patients measured by WHO (World Health Organisation) 7 category ordinary scale, changes in interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels, secondary infections and duration of ICU stay. Result(s): Tocilizumab was administered between 3-27 days after the patient reported symptoms ( a median of 10.9 days ) and between the 1st to 3rd day of ICU admission (median of 2.1 days) . In Tocilizumab group, 16(42.1%) of 38 patients died in ICU whereas in standard of care group, 27(32.53%) of 83 patients died. The difference in clinical status assessed using WHO (World Health Organisation) 7 category ordinary scale at 28 days between Tocilizumab group and standard of care group was not statistically significant (odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 2.97, p = 0.44). Conclusion(s): Tocilizumab plus standard care was not superior to standard care alone in reducing mortality and improving clinical outcomes at day 28.Copyright © RJPT All right reserved.

Tocilizumab Initiation based on Indicator in Patients Infected by Coronavirus-19 to Prevent Intubation

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created severe medical and economic consequences worldwide since 2019. Tocilizumab is one of the therapies considered capable of improving the condition of patients with COVID-19. However, there is not much information about the best time to give tocilizumab. METHOD(S): This was an analytical study with a retrospective cohort design, using the data of 125 patients infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) with signs of acute respiratory distress syndrome in Dr. Moewardi Hospital, Surakarta, from March to August 2020. We analyzed various available clinical data to see which factors into clinical improvement with tocilizumab therapy. RESULT(S): Most patients showed clinical improvement after administration of tocilizumab. During the follow-up period, 21 patients died despite tocilizumab therapy. Significant risk factors associated with the need for intubation were heart rate, neutrophil, lymphocyte, pH, PaCO2, and PO2. The most influential variable on the need for intubation without being associated with other risk factors was PaO2 (p = 0.003, Confidence Intervals 95%). CONCLUSION(S): Tocilizumab has a role in treating patients infected by SARS-CoV-2, preventing the need for intubation when given to patients in good saturation condition with oxygen supplementation without positive pressure (PaO2 >65mmHg;SpO2 >93%).Copyright © 2023 Septian Adi Permana, Adhrie Sugiarto, Sidharta Kusuma Manggala, Muhammad Husni Thamrin, Purwoko Purwoko, Handayu Ganitafuri.

COVID-19: our experience and quality of management analysis: (Topolsica Hospital case report)

Various Slovenian hospitals were recruited to treat COVID-19 patients in Slovenia during the COVID-19 epidemic. Centrally coordinated hospital utilisation - depending on the needs, available hospital bed capacity, and considering the professional orientation of individual hospitals - left these facilities with different experiences. We present our experience and COVID-19 treatment management during the fourth epidemic wave in our peripheral, pulmonary-oriented hospital, representing the first treatment quality analysis of these patients in Slovenia. The basic hospitalization characteristics were analysed using integrated Birpis information system solutions and the electronic temperature-therapeutic charts (eTTL) review. The quality of management was assessed through adherence to professional recommendations. The analysis was carried out with the in-built statistical functions of Microsoft Excel software. 99 patients (58 women, 41 men) aged 67.9 years were hospitalised for an average of 8.1 days. The majority were residents of our region (61%), unvaccinated (61.6%), and experienced a severe form of the disease with the need for oxygen supplementation (88.9%). The majority received steroids (73.7%), antibiotics (68.7%) and vitamin D (71.7%), to a lesser extent specific therapy (remdesivir 25.3%, combination casirivimab/imdevimab 2%, tocilizumab 1%). No adverse reactions were noted. 17 people died (total mortality rate 17.2%). There was no infection transmission among the COVID department staff. Results show successful treatment of patients with COVID-19 in Topolsica Hospital. They also suggest the possibility of further improvements, particularly in prescribing antibiotic therapy.

Immunosuppression and Covid-19: Risk factor or treatment?

Introduction: During the Covid-19 pandemic, 540,895 people were identified as immunosuppressed and believed to be at increased risk of severe disease.1 As the pandemic evolved, biologic immunosuppression became a treatment of severe Covid-19.2 The true impact of immunosuppression on disease severity remains unclear. Objective(s): 1. Identify the incidence of immunosuppressed patients admitted to the ICU. 2. Analyse the mortality of those who are immunocompetent and immunosuppressed. 3. Examine the differences in mortality and level of care required between sub groups of patients on immunosuppression;those on biologics, non-biologics, and a combination of both. Method(s): A retrospective search of all Covid-19 positive admissions from March 2020 to November 2021 across two adult ICUs at Chelsea & Westminster NHS Trust was performed, using the EPR system. We identified those on immunosuppressive drugs, the level of care they required, and 28 day mortality. We categorised different types of immunosuppression, vaccination status, if applicable and co-morbidities. The exclusion criteria were primarily those with false positive swabs or incomplete data. Result(s): Baseline characteristics were median age (56 vs 56), and APCHE II score (20.08 in the immunosuppressed group vs 14.0 in immunocompetent). Thirteen immunosuppressed patients were identified. Reasons for drug immunosuppression in this group included solid organ transplant (6/13), and autoimmune conditions (7/13). Two patients were on biologic drugs alone, 8 were on non-biologics, and 3 were on a combination. Four of this group had received at least 2 doses of a Covid-19 vaccine. Mortality was 61.54% (8/13) in the immunosuppressed group vs 36.65% (199/543) in the immunocompetent group. Conclusion(s): Despite similar demographics, patients on immunosuppression had a significantly higher mortality than the immunocompetent group. Interestingly, those on targeted biological immunosuppression had the lowest incidence of requiring level 3 care, and no deaths. It is a possibility that biologics dampen the hyper-inflammation seen in severe Covid-19 pneumonitis, raising the question of a possible protective benefit from severe disease. This reflects the findings of the REMAP-CAP investigators,3 who showed that the IL-6 inhibiting biologics Tocilizumab and Sarilumab are efficacious against the most severe disease following admission to ICU with Covid-19 pneumonitis. The single centre and retrospective observational design, combined with small numbers on immunosuppression, despite a large inclusion criterion, mean it is not possible to make statistical conclusions. Confounding factors include the effects of vaccination, shielding and the change in SARS-CoV-2 variant prevalent during different times during the pandemic.

Peripartum Covid 19 admissions in an intensive care unit - Case series

Introduction: Peripartum women are at increased risk for severe illness with coronavirus disease (Covid-19) infection. Recent medical literature has drawn attention to the possible influence of COVID-19 on the course of pregnancies and its long-term effects.1-5 Objective: This case series aimed to observe the clinical course of peripartum women with confirmed Covid-19 admitted to a critical care unit in the North-west of England. Method(s): Since the start of the pandemic, all pregnant women with Covid-19 infection admitted to the critical care unit were monitored and followed up. Demographic profile, medical co-morbidities, treatment received, respiratory support and vaccination status were noted. Result(s): From March 2020 until February 2022, 8 women in our practice were shifted to the critical care unit post-partum in view of worsening work of breathing & increasing oxygen requirement after initial management in the delivery suite. All admissions were during the 3rd wave of the pandemic in the UK, between June to October 2021. 5 patients underwent Caesarean section under spinal anesthesia & 3 were shifted post normal vaginal delivery. Mean age in the study population was 33.25 years (SD +/- 3.99) and mean length of stay in the ICU was 6.62 days (SD +/- 3.99). Only one woman required intubation & mechanical ventilation for 10 days and the rest were managed on High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) or Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) hood and self-proning manoeuvres. 50% of the patients received Tocilizumab. All women were discharged home and there were no maternal deaths. Pre- admission none of the women were vaccinated, but on follow up 5 out of the 8 had completed their vaccination. All women were emotionally distraught due to being isolated from their family and new born. When reviewed at 12 weeks, one patient experienced post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and one had features of long Covid syndrome. On follow up, all new born babies were doing well. Conclusion(s): From the limited amount of data available, psychological stress was common to all patients. Being isolated from their new-born and family was the most difficult emotional aspect for the mothers in addition to finding it difficult to breathe and uncertainty about the future. Most mothers and new-born babies were discharged from the hospital without any serious complications. However, further observation and long term follow up is imperative. Use of guidelines in peripartum patients will aid in appropriate escalation of care. Key words: COVID-19, Pregnancy, Peri-partum, Long Covid syndrome.

SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with multiple myeloma: survey in 23 centers across Europe and USA

Introduction: Despite several studies, the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on patients with multiple myeloma remains uncertain. Material(s) and Method(s): We performed a survey that covered the period of the first and second waves of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic in 23 centers inseven countries. Out of 352 patients with myeloma and SARS-CoV-2, 23% died. Results/Conclusions: Logistic regression showed a lower risk of death among patients treated with proteasome inhibitor and a higher risk of death for those who had a severe or a very severe course of disease.Copyright © 2023 Sciendo. All rights reserved.

Clinical characteristics and risk factors of patients with COVID-19 developing barotrauma

Background: At our hospital, people with COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) had a high rate of pulmonary barotrauma. Therefore, the current study looked at barotrauma in COVID-19 patients getting invasive and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation to assess its prevalence, clinical results, and features. Methodology: Our retrospective cohort study comprised of adult COVID-19 pneumonia patients who visited our tertiary care hospital between April 2020 and September 2021 and developed barotrauma. Result(s): Sixty-eight patients were included in this study. Subcutaneous emphysema was the most frequent type of barotrauma, reported at 67.6%;pneumomediastinum, reported at 61.8%;pneumothorax, reported at 47.1%. The most frequent device associated with barotrauma was CPAP (51.5%). Among the 68 patients, 27.9% were discharged without supplemental oxygen, while 4.4% were discharged on oxygen. 76.5% of the patients expired because of COVID pneumonia and its complications. In addition, 38.2% of the patients required invasive mechanical breathing, and 77.9% of the patients were admitted to the ICU. Conclusion(s): Barotrauma in COVID-19 can pose a serious risk factor leading to mortality. Also, using CPAP was linked to a higher risk of barotrauma.Copyright © 2021 Muslim OT et al.

COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF TOCILIZUMAB AND CYTOSORB ON BLOOD CYTOKIENE LEVELS IN PATIENTS WITH SARS-CoV-2 PNEUMONIA

Background/aims: SARS-CoV-2 is responsible of respiratory failure and also causes a massive release of inflammatory mediators such as IL-6, IL-1, CRP etc. This hyperinflammatory condition, often indicated as Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS), could led to life-threatening events. The clinical course resembles septic shock and the elevated values of inflammatory mediators are associated with a higher viral load and reduced survival. The use of techniques aiming to contrast the surge of inflammatory mediators has been advocated in the treatment of this condition. Method(s): Four patients were retrospectively admitted in Intensive Care Unit with respiratory failure caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Two patients were treated with Tocilizumab (TCZ) alone, the others received TCZ in association with hemoadsorption (HA) treatment. The HA procedure was performed with CytoSorb responsible of removing hydrophobic molecules with a molecular weight of up to approximately 60 kDa including cytokines and other inflammatory mediators involved in CRS. Each procedure lasts 24 hours. Blood values of IL-6, C-reactive protein (CRP) and other biochemical variables were measured in two patients who received Tocilizumab (TCZ) alone and in other two in whom it was associated with hemoadsorption (TCZ- HA). All variables were measured before, during and after the treatment. The aim of the study is to assess the variations of IL-6 in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection treated with TCZ alone or in association with hemoadsorption (HA). Result(s): All patients full-filled the criteria of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. In all patients the administration of TCZ was followed by an increasing in IL-6 values. Its values remained elevated in patients given TCZ but sharply decreased in the following days in those treated also with HA. The percentage variations of IL-6 from the baseline between the two groups was +344% and +89% in the two patients treated with TCZ alone and - 56% and -15% in TCZ-HA group. Both TCZ and TCZ-HA were well tolerated. Conclusion(s): The increase of the IL-6 can be ascribed to its displacement from cellular and soluble receptors, whereas its decrease is likely due to the scavenging effect exerted by the HA. Although the association TCZ- HA could be valuable in the treatment of the Cytokine Release Storm (CRS) associated with SARS-CoV-2, the HA could be more effective as it neutralizes a wider panel of inflammatory mediators. More experience is needed to identify the best candidate for TCZ or TCZ-HA.

Comparing effects of invasive versus non-invasive ventilation on P/F ratio, CRP and respiratory rate of COVID patients, a retrospective observational study

Introduction: Some of the COVID pneumonitis patients are happily hypoxic and not showing signs of severe respiratory distress despite being significantly hypoxic,1 leading to a delay to start a timely treatment and may worsen the prognosis.2 Studies have shown that non-invasive ventilation could be used in severe COVID pneumonitis and could avoid intubation in some of those patients.3 Effects of different modalities of ventilation on the oxygenation of COVID-19 patients and on the inflammatory process accompanying COVID-19 pneumonitis need thorough investigation in a trial to reach to an understanding of the pathophysiological process and may be a guide to formulate the optimum protocol to ventilate COVID-19 patients. Objective(s): Comparing the effects of invasive versus non-invasive ventilation on P/F ratio, CRP and respiratory rate of COVID-19 patients. Method(s): In this retrospective observational study, we compared the effect of NIV on the P/F ratio, CRP trends and Respiratory rates of COVID patients during their ITU admission in comparison with intubated ventilated patients. The study was carried out in a single center in England before introduction of the Tocilizumab in the guidelines of COVID treatment and included 74 COVID patients divided in to two groups, group A which included 15 patients who were non-invasively ventilated and avoided intubation during their ITU admission while group B included 59 patients who were intubated at certain point of their course of admission. Patients Respiratory rate, modality of ventilation, time of intubation (if any), modes of ventilation, FIO2, P/F ratio and CRP trends were followed during their admission. The collected data of 3 variable (CRP, RR and P/F ratio) has been blotted and a summative means were calculated. The least square means of the linear models of the ventilated and non-ventilated patients were used to compare both groups. Result(s): 36.4 % of intubations was done before or during the first 20 hours of the ITU admissions and 50% during the first 40 hours. The study also has shown the probabilities in the difference between slopes as following. Firstly, regarding P/F ratio the probability was 0.058 in favor of non-invasive ventilation. Secondly, RR probability was <0.0001 significantly in favor of non-invasive ventilation. Lastly, CRP probability was 0.024 significantly in favor of non-invasively ventilated patients. Conclusion(s): CRP and respiratory rate were significantly less in non-invasively ventilated COVID pneumonitis patients in comparison with ventilated patients while there was no significant difference in P/F ratio trends between both groups.

Tocilizumab Associated With Survival in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Low Urine Output.

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with oliguria is associated with increased mortality. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) plays an integral role in the pathophysiology of both disease processes. Patients who experience severe COVID-19 have demonstrated higher IL-6 levels compared to baseline, and use of tocilizumab has demonstrated efficacy in such cohorts. We set out to investigate the relationship between tocilizumab use, COVID-19 ARDS, low urine output, and mortality. METHODS: Retrospective cohort review of adult patients aged ≥ 18 years with COVID-19 and moderate or severe ARDS, admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary referral center in metropolitan Detroit. Patients were analyzed based on presence of oliguria (defined as ≤ 0.7 mL/kg/h) on the day of intubation and exposure to tocilizumab while inpatient. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-eight patients were analyzed, 103 (80%) with low urine output, of whom 30 (29%) received tocilizumab. In patients with low urine output, risk factors associated with mortality on univariate analysis included Black race (P = .028), lower static compliance (P = .015), and tocilizumab administration (P = .002). Tocilizumab (odds ratio 0.245, 95% confidence interval 0.079-0.764, P = .015) was the only risk factor independently associated with survival on multivariate logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort review of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and moderate or severe ARDS, tocilizumab administration was independently associated with survival in patients with low urine output ≤ 0.7 mL/kg/h on the day of intubation. Prospective studies are needed to investigate the impact of urine output on efficacy of interleukin-targeted therapies in the management of ARDS.

Efficacy and safety of interleukin-6 receptor antagonists in adult patients admitted to intensive care unit with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The purpose of the systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6) antagonists (tocilizumab, sarilumab) in adult patients with severe or critical COVID-19. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in Medline, Cochrane and Embase databases, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov from the inception dates to10 January 2023. Randomized clinical trials comparing IL-6 receptor antagonists (tocilizumab, sarilumab) with a placebo or usual care treatment for adult patients with severe or critical COVID-19 were identified. Two independent reviewers performed the assessment and selection of eligible studies, assessed study quality and extracted data. Relative risk (RR), mean difference (MD), and 95% confidence interval (CI) with random-effects models was performed in meta-analysis. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the quality of the evidence. The search retrieved a total of 11 RCTs involving 5028 participants were eligible for meta-analysis. Our findings suggest that as the new drug used in adult patients with severe or critical COVID-19, IL-6 antagonists (tocilizumab, sarilumab) may reduce the length of ICU stay and hospital stay. However, they did not significantly increase the risks of serious adverse events and did not reduce all-cause mortality (28-day, 14-day, and 7-day).

Tocilizumab for treatment of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (ca-AMR) remains unclear. Tocilizumab (TCZ), a monoclonal antibody against IL-6, has been proposed as a therapeutic option. We reported our experience treating ca-AMR with TCZ either as the first line option or as a rescue therapy. METHODS: We studied 11 adult kidney transplant recipients with biopsy-proven ca-AMR and preserved kidney function (eGFR 57 ± 18) who were treated with TCZ (8 mg/kg IV monthly). All biopsies were prompted by abnormal surveillance biomarker testing with DSA and/or dd-cfDNA. Clinical monitoring included dd-cfDNA and DSA testing every 3 months during the treatment with TCZ. RESULTS: In this cohort, ca-AMR was diagnosed at a median of 90 months (range 14-224) post-transplant, and 4 of 11 patients had DSA negative ca-AMR. Patients received a minimum of 3 months of TCZ, with 6 patients receiving at least 12 months of TCZ. Dd-cfDNA was elevated in all patients, with a median 2.24% at the start of TCZ treatment. After 6 months of TCZ treatment, 8/11 patients had dd- cfDNA <1%, and 3/11 had values <0.5%. Among those who completed at least 12 months of TCZ, dd-cfDNA decreased by 29% at 6 months (p = .05) and 47% by 12 months (p = .04). DSA also stabilized and, by 12 months, was reduced by 29% (p = .047). Graft function remained stable with no graft loss during treatment. There was a nonsignificant trend towards proteinuria reduction. During the course of treatment with tocilizumab, two patients experienced moderate to severe infections. CONCLUSIONS: In our early short-term experience, TCZ appears to reduce graft injury as measured by dd-cfDNA and modulate the immune response as evident by a modest reduction in immunodominant DSA MFI. Allograft function and proteinuria also stabilized.

Tocilizumab versus anakinra in COVID-19: results from propensity score matching.

Background: Tocilizumab and anakinra are anti-interleukin drugs to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) refractory to corticosteroids. However, no studies compared the efficacy of tocilizumab versus anakinra to guide the choice of the therapy in clinical practice. We aimed to compare the outcomes of COVID-19 patients treated with tocilizumab or anakinra. Methods: Our retrospective study was conducted in three French university hospitals between February 2021 and February 2022 and included all the consecutive hospitalized patients with a laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection assessed by RT-PCR who were treated with tocilizumab or anakinra. A propensity score matching was performed to minimize confounding effects due to the non-random allocation. Results: Among 235 patients (mean age, 72 years; 60.9% of male patients), the 28-day mortality (29.4% vs. 31.2%, p = 0.76), the in-hospital mortality (31.7% vs. 33.0%, p = 0.83), the high-flow oxygen requirement (17.5% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.86), the intensive care unit admission rate (30.8% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.30), and the mechanical ventilation rate (15.4% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.50) were similar in patients receiving tocilizumab and those receiving anakinra. After propensity score matching, the 28-day mortality (29.1% vs. 30.4%, p = 1) and the rate of high-flow oxygen requirement (10.1% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.081) did not differ between patients receiving tocilizumab or anakinra. Secondary infection rates were similar between the tocilizumab and anakinra groups (6.3% vs. 9.2%, p = 0.44). Conclusion: Our study showed comparable efficacy and safety profiles of tocilizumab and anakinra to treat severe COVID-19.

COVID-19 IN A PATIENT WITH GRANULOMATOSIS WITH POLYANGIITIS: MANAGEMENT TACTICS

Patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) cause extreme alertness during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, associated with many factors: the initial damage to the respiratory system (upper respiratory tract, lungs) and kidneys, immunosuppressive treatments, difficult prognosis of COVID-19 with the risk of AAV exacerbation. We present a clinical case of a moderate COVID-19 in a patient with granulomatosis with polyangiitis, who received anti-B cell therapy with rituximab (RTX) for a long time. Coronavirus pneumonia developed one year after RTX, while B-lymphocyte depletion persisted. In order to achieve an adequate antiviral immune response and prevent hyperinflammation, treatment was carried out with antiviral drugs, anticoagulants, convalescent plasma, human normal immunoglobulin, and interleukin-6 antagonist tocilizumab. Possible predictors of severe COVID-19 in patients with AAV are discussed.Copyright © 2023 Ima-Press Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Catheter-Related Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis: A Case Series

Background/Aims Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is characterised by endothelial dysfunction and vasculopathy, which may lead to venous thrombosis. Here, we report four cases of extensive venous thrombosis of the upper limbs and right atrium associated with implantable venous access devices (port-a-cath) in patients with a diagnosis of SSc, who presented to our specialist centre between 2018 and 2022. Methods We retrospectively reviewed four patients with SSc and port-a-cathassociated thrombosis who presented to the Department of Rheumatology, Royal Free Hospital NHS Trust between 2018 and 2022. All patients are diagnosed with systemic sclerosis according to the 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria. Results Three patients were diagnosed with a port-a-cath-associated thrombosis in 2022, and one in 2018. Two patients had limited cutaneous SSc with positive anti-centromere antibodies, and 2 had diffuse subset with anti-U3RNP antibodies. All patients had a right-sided port-a-cath that had been in-situ for at least 3 years. Two patients were diagnosed with right atrium thrombus (measuring 2.2 and 3cm respectively), one patient with an internal jugular vein and right subclavian thrombosis, and one with a left subclavian thrombosis. None had a history of previous thromboembolic event. A full thrombophilia screen was negative in 2 patients, and is pending in the others. Of note, 2 patients had COVID-19 infection within the 3 months prior the thrombotic event. 1 patient had tocilizumab administered through the line, 1 rituximab and IVIG, the other 2 had prostanoids only. Conclusion We described four recent cases of port-a-cath-associated thrombosis of the upper limbs and right atrium in SSc patients with no previous history of thrombosis. This highlights the increased risk of thrombosis related to long term indwelling catheters in SSc and demonstrates the potential interplay between covid microvasculopathy and the associated thrombotic risks reported with both ACA and antiU3RNP antibodies in SSc. We note that from previous reports the relative lower risk of adverse outcomes in SSc patient receiving parenteral nutrition. Further research into frequency of port-a-cath-related thrombosis in SSc patients is warranted, especially with use of prostanoids, and adequate screening and non-invasive follow up might be needed to avoid life-threatening thromboembolic complications. (Table Presented).

Relationship between Sars-Cov-2 Viral Load, Antigen Positivity and Infectious Titer

Intro: Performance of SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests is described relative to RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values. However, Ct values may not be consistent between tests from different manufacturers, or even between runs. Here we correlate the Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen assay results to a quantitative RT-PCR readout as a more reproducible measure of viral load. Additionally, we look at the relationship between the antigen test results, viral load and infectious titer. Method(s): Longitudinal nasopharyngeal swab samples from patients (N=452) with severe Covid-19 pneumonia collected between 03 April and 28 May 2020 in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Tocilizumab (COVACTA), were assessed for SARS-CoV-2 viral load (RNA copies/ mL) and a qualitative and semi-quantitative readout of Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen assay. Viral culture experiments were performed to determine the infectious titer (TCID50/ mL) in a subset of samples. Agreement analysis was performed to compare the results of the assays. Please note that the current intended use of Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen assay is the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen. Finding(s): We observed high negative percent agreement between the Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen assay results and the RT-PCR results, while the positive percent agreement was only high in samples exceeding a certain viral load and at earlier time points from symptom onset. Infectious titer values and both the antigen assay semi-quantitative readout and the quantitative RT-PCR results correlated well. Positive percent agreement of RT-PCR and antigen results in relation to infectious titer was very high in both cases, while negative percent agreement was moderate to low. Conclusion(s): These data show that in patients with high viral load the Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen assay correlates well qualitatively and quantitatively with the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and infectious virus as determined by RT-PCR and viral culture, respectively.Copyright © 2023

Monoclonal antibodies to the interleukin-6 receptor in the treatment of COVID-19 in patients with chronic kidney disease

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) plays a key role in the pathogenesis of COVID-19, which determines the indications for the therapeutic use of its antagonists. However, data on their effectiveness and optimal timing of appointment are contradictory. The question of the possibility of their use in patients with impaired kidney function has not been studied. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of monoclonal antibodies to IL-6 receptors in COVID-19 in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) of stages 2-5 (predialysis) who do not need renal replacement therapy. Material and methods. A clinical retrospective uncontrolled single-center study included 45 patients (60% of men) with CKD stages 2-5 aged 22-95 years (median - 58 years) hospitalized with predominantly severe uncritical COVID-19 infection. Treatment of COVID-19 was carried out in accordance with the Interim guidelines for the prevention and treatment of new coronavirus infection of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation. Results. The majority of patients (n=36;73.3%) had CKD stage 3b-5, CKD stage 2 was in 7 (15.5%) and stage 3a - in 5 (11.1%) patients. The median serum creatinine level (Cr) was 164 [131;292] mumol/l, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 30 [13;49] ml/min/1.73 m2, CRP 67.5 [37.2;106.75] mg/l. The introduction of monoclonal antibody to IL-6 receptors led to a decrease in the activity of the infectious process (CRP 1.55 [0.33;4.15] mg/l, p<0.001), regression of pneumonia, which did not require mechanical ventilation and hospitalization in the intensive care unit. According to the decision of the medical commission, patients were injected with monoclonal antibodies to IL-6 receptors: tocilizumab (n=36;80%), levilimab (n=2;4.4%), combined therapy with two drugs (n=7;15.5%). Therapy with IL-6 antagonists did not have a negative effect on kidney function. The levels of Cr decreased on average from 224.3+/-145.2 mmol/l at admission to 160+/-92.55 mmol/l at discharge (p<0.001), GFR increased from 32.6+/-20.9 ml/min/1.73 m2 at admission to 53+/-31.7 ml/min/1.73 m2 at discharge (p<0.001). In the majority of patients (n=36, 80%) GFR has risen, and only in 9 (20%) cases it remained approximately at the same low level. No serious adverse events have been reported with the use of IL-6 antagonists, as well as concomitant infectious complications. No deaths have been reported. The median length of stay in bed was 14 [10;19] days. Conclusion. The results of the study allow us to state that in patients with CKD, monoclonal antibodies to IL-6 receptors have a good safety profile and can be successfully used in moderate and severe forms of COVID-19, regardless of the state of kidney function.Copyright © 2022 by the authors.